<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mar Cabeza</title>
	<link>http://www.marcabeza.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Top-predators as biodiversity surrogates? Clarifying some issues</title>
		<link>http://www.marcabeza.com/?p=23</link>
		<comments>http://www.marcabeza.com/?p=23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Press releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcabeza.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top predators may be good biodiversity indicators if they are highly specialized in their habitat and food requirements, if they are sensitive to human disturbance and if they have a small range. There are few examples of such predators (some raptors are among them), and often include highly threatened species; concentrating conservation efforts on them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marcabeza.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=23</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top-predator&#8217;s debate</title>
		<link>http://www.marcabeza.com/?p=19</link>
		<comments>http://www.marcabeza.com/?p=19#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Press releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcabeza.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to give your opinion on the debate about surrogates for biodiversity, and particularly, on the potential use of top-predators as such (see new publication, and press release)
MarÂ 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marcabeza.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=19</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
